1 Nov 2025
The Benelli 250's performance and technical specifications are extensively compared against competitors like the Dominar and other models, including an 180cc, revealing insights into acceleration and real-world differences. Despite initial expectations, its market value and price point are critically assessed against its performance, suggesting it struggles to justify its cost in the current competitive landscape without specific conditions.

The Moto News channel features a detailed comparison, initially highlighting a Benelli model and discussing its size, particularly an engine identified as 278, intended for a 'Colt' series, pitted against a Dominar and a 250cc motorcycle.
The comparison proceeded to evaluate technical specifications and real-world performance differences, focusing on acceleration from zero to one hundred, with an expectation to quantify the margin of difference between the tested motorcycles.
During performance runs, issues like a bad launch were noted, and subsequent analyses clarified that horsepower, torque, and RPM significantly influenced the outcomes, explaining the observed performance differences and the overall conclusion that the gap was not as substantial as initially anticipated.
The discussion extended to placing the 250cc model within the competitive landscape of similar motorcycles, positioning the Dominar as a leading option, followed by other brands, and then the Benelli, particularly differentiating between two-cylinder and single-cylinder models.
The Benelli 180 model was noted for its performance, generating strong opinions and comparison points, with an observation that it 'pulls' surprisingly well against a 250cc, holding a distinct market niche despite lacking the acceleration and size of higher-capacity axles.
The 250cc engine's performance, particularly its speed up to 170 without a cutoff in sixth gear (referencing an older 'Wolf' engine's capabilities), was contrasted with the current model's value proposition, deemed expensive, similar to a 'Lucky 185', and not living up to its potential in terms of performance for its price.
The price history of the Benelli 402 was recalled, noting its initial high price of 230 tomans, which was later reduced to 178 tomans, making it more reasonable; however, in the current market, its new price is not considered worthwhile unless accompanied by special conditions, pushing it into the second-hand market category where numerous 250cc options exist.
Despite its performance limitations compared to some 250s, the bike is characterized as 'hassle-free', lacking special modes or options, and free from strange problems, making it a viable consideration in the second-hand market if a clean model is found.
The overall conclusion emphasized that performance cannot be judged solely by technical numbers, highlighting the importance of real-world experience and testing, with the price range of comparable models like the Dominar and the tested 250cc model now being quite similar.
You can't judge by numbers.
| Aspect | Benelli 250 | Comparison/Context |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Outcome | The actual performance difference against rivals was not as significant as initially expected, influenced by factors like horsepower, torque, and RPM. | Real-world testing showed that theoretical numbers alone do not fully dictate performance outcomes, leading to surprising results. |
| Market Value & Price | Its initial high price (230 tomans) was later reduced (178 tomans), but its current new price is not justified without special conditions. | In a competitive 250cc market, models like the Dominar are now in a similar price range, pushing the Benelli 250 towards the second-hand category for value. |
| Market Positioning | Positioned below top rivals like Dominar 250 among 250cc motorcycles. | The market prioritizes certain performance and value propositions, placing some models ahead of others based on overall package. |
| Reliability & Features | Characterized as hassle-free, lacking special modes or options, and without unusual problems. | Offers a straightforward ownership experience, potentially appealing to those seeking simplicity and reliability over advanced features. |
| Engine Performance (Historical) | An older engine (referred to as 'Wolf') achieved 170 km/h without a cutoff in sixth gear, highlighting past performance capabilities. | Past models demonstrated strong acceleration and speed, setting a benchmark that newer iterations are evaluated against. |
