29 Sept 2025
The discussion explores whether artificial intelligence represents an economic bubble, akin to the metaverse hype or the dot-com phenomenon of the early 2000s, by examining arguments for and against this classification. An economic bubble describes a situation where an asset's financial value surpasses its real value, potentially leading to business failures despite initial profitability.
An economic bubble occurs when the financial value of an asset, such as stocks, land, or commodities, significantly exceeds its real underlying value, which, despite offering potential immediate profit, can lead to business failures in the future.
The dot-com bubble, the most prominent technology bubble, originated around 1999 with the commercialization of the internet, which became widely accessible after the introduction of the Mosaic browser, later known as Netscape.
Netscape's initial public offering (IPO) on August 9, 1995, set an initial stock price of $28, but due to intense hype, the price closed at $85 on the first day, increasing the company's valuation to $2.9 billion and generating widespread excitement.
The rapid ascent of dot-com companies created a 'Fear Of Missing Out' (FOMO) phenomenon, compelling many businesses, like Miss International which rebranded to Cosmos.com, to incorporate '.com' into their names, often resulting in significant, unearned stock value increases.
One reason AI may be a bubble is the trend of risk-averse investors, including venture capitalists, investing billions into any entity with 'AI' in its description, regardless of potential outcomes, leading to a mushrooming of AI companies.
AI is increasingly being indiscriminately applied to everyday products, from toothbrushes to internet packages, without clear results, mirroring the superficial adoption of '.com' by businesses during the dot-com era.
Even major companies like Apple have demonstrated a lack of readiness for AI, launching prototypes with significant delays, while a multitude of new AI companies emerge weekly, making billions in promises often without delivering tangible results.
It has become easy to attract billions in capital for AI startups by simply assembling a small team and claiming to use machine learning or large language models for novel applications, even if these ideas are impractical or non-functional.
Artificial intelligence is not a bubble because it is deeply integrated into daily life through algorithms on platforms like YouTube and Instagram, as well as personalized services from mobile operators, demonstrating its inherent value and widespread utility since the 1950s.
Leading technology companies such as Microsoft and Google are making substantial and strategic long-term investments in AI, including spending billions on data for AI training and developing proprietary AI chips, which indicates a recognized and expensive future for the technology.
Nvidia, a crucial hardware supplier for AI, exhibits sustainable and rational market growth, likened to a shovel seller during a gold rush, demonstrating increasing value based on its foundational contributions to the AI ecosystem.
Major tech companies like Google and Microsoft, having previously navigated the dot-com bubble and avoided speculative ventures such as the metaverse, are making highly selective investments in AI, suggesting their ability to discern genuine innovation from speculative bubbles.
AI's utility and effectiveness are highly dependent on context and application; it can be transformative for tasks like content generation or data analysis but may be unsuitable for others, such as complex industrial design for companies like Mercedes-Benz.
Whether artificial intelligence constitutes a bubble is entirely subjective and contingent upon the specific industry, circumstances, and how the technology is being applied and utilized, emphasizing the importance for users to understand their tools.
Artificial intelligence's status as a bubble is subjective, depending entirely on the specific circumstances, industry, application, and intended use.
| aspect | description_of_aspect | historical_comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Economic Bubble Definition | An economic bubble occurs when an asset's financial market value significantly surpasses its true intrinsic value, leading to potential future market corrections or crashes. | This fundamental definition applies to both the dot-com bubble and the current speculation surrounding AI, where assets are traded at prices detached from their underlying worth. |
| Dot-Com Bubble Characteristics | The dot-com bubble began around 1999, driven by internet commercialization, illustrated by Netscape's IPO that saw its stock price skyrocket within a single day, fueled by hype and investor excitement. | The dot-com era fostered a 'Fear Of Missing Out' (FOMO) mentality, leading many companies to simply add '.com' to their names, resulting in speculative stock increases without corresponding real value, a pattern potentially mirrored in current AI investments. |
| Arguments for AI as a Bubble | AI is potentially a bubble due to risk-averse investors pouring billions into any AI-related venture, a rapid proliferation of new AI companies, and the indiscriminate application of AI to products without proven results. | This parallels the dot-com bubble where companies blindly integrated internet-related terms, and investors funded numerous startups based on hype rather than sustainable business models, leading to many failures when the bubble burst. |
| Arguments Against AI as a Bubble | AI is deeply integrated into daily life through algorithms and personalized services, and major tech companies like Microsoft and Google are making substantial, strategic investments in AI research, data, and proprietary hardware. | Unlike the dot-com era's limited internet access and speculative investments, AI is now ubiquitous and backed by calculated, long-term commitments from companies that successfully navigated the previous bubble, suggesting a more grounded value. |
| Nvidia's Unique Position | Nvidia, a primary supplier of AI hardware (chips), demonstrates sustainable growth, acting like the 'shovel seller' during a gold rush, providing essential infrastructure regardless of individual AI application success. | Nvidia's growth contrasts with purely speculative ventures, as its value is derived from providing the fundamental tools for the AI industry, ensuring its relevance even if some AI applications prove to be short-lived bubbles. |
| Subjectivity of AI's Value | The true value and utility of AI are highly context-dependent, proving invaluable for specific applications like content creation or data analysis, yet useless for others like complex industrial design, making its bubble status application-specific. | Similar to the dot-com era where some internet companies (e.g., Google) thrived while others failed due to lacking a clear value proposition, AI's success depends on its effective and appropriate application, not its mere presence. |
3 Oct 2025
29 Sept 2025
5 Nov 2025
