1 Nov 2025
Motorcycle engine tests commenced, focusing on clutch and launch performance across 180cc, 250cc, and 278cc displacements. Findings revealed strong performance from the 180cc engine and disappointment with the 278A's low-rpm output, prompting further comparison plans against other models.
The testing session began with an initial focus on clutch and engine launch capabilities, noting early observations of power output like 20 horsepower and specific low-rpm torque figures.
Technical specifications and riding tests were conducted to compare different engine sizes, specifically evaluating 180cc and 250cc models to understand their performance characteristics.
Repeated attempts to launch revealed challenges with clutch engagement and difficulty in achieving optimal performance in higher gears, often requiring more assertive engine input.
Engines were changed to eliminate uncertainties and clarify performance variations, particularly emphasizing that a significant difference should be observed between 180cc and 250cc displacements.
A specific '18' engine demonstrated surprisingly strong acceleration, contradicting initial low expectations, while another engine, potentially 278cc (not 250cc), underperformed relative to its size.
A 298CDI cruiser engine's performance caused disappointment as its output did not align with common expectations for such an engine, highlighting a gap between perceived and actual capability.
The characteristic of Euro engines, specifically the 278A, was identified as a primary reason for unmet expectations, with its performance not comparing favorably to a 250 due to only 24 Newtons at low rpm.
The discussion stressed the importance of evaluating engines in their factory mode rather than relying on remapping or catalyst removal for performance comparison, despite the potential for such modifications to boost efficiency.
The 180cc engine exhibited very good performance, whereas the 250cc engine was deemed to not meet expectations at all, leading to a strong contrast in findings regarding their suitability.
Upcoming videos will feature further comparisons against models like the Kieve Odisla, Dominator, and Duke to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of engine quality and performance.
You suddenly get disappointed when you spend money and come to such an engine, because its 24 Newtons at low rpm do not meet your expectations.
| Key_Aspect | Observation | Implication/Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Launch & Power | Clutch issues and poor launch; only 24 Newtons at low rpm. | Performance described as 'not 20 horsepower', disappointing compared to expectations for a 250. |
| 180cc Engine Performance | Demonstrated very good and surprising acceleration. | Significantly outperformed expectations, especially in contrast to the 250cc. |
| 250cc Engine Performance | Did not meet expectations; described as 'doesn't fit at all'. | Considered underperforming, prompting engine changes to resolve doubts. |
| 278A / Cruiser Engine | Generated 24 Newtons at low rpm, leading to disappointment. | Expectations for a cruiser engine (e.g., 298CDI) were not met, suggesting it's 'closed' or underpowered. |
| Engine Evaluation Basis | Emphasized considering factory mode and standard conditions. | Remapping or catalyst removal, while possible, are not standard for fair comparison. |
| Future Benchmarking | Planned comparisons with Kieve Odisla, Dominator, and Duke. | Aims to further assess engine quality and validate current findings against stronger competitors. |
