29 Sept 2025
This digital buying guide, a segment of the weekly hardware news program 'war on Silicon,' offers an extensive overview of smartphones currently available in the market. It provides recommendations and comparisons for models across price ranges from 10 to over 100 million tomans, advising against delayed purchases.

This buying guide, part of a weekly hardware news program, covers phone purchases across price points from 10 to over 100 million tomans, encouraging prompt buying decisions due to market instability.
While many phones exist under 10 million tomans, few are genuinely worth purchasing due to age, inherent problems, or superior competitors. Xiaomi holds an advantage in the mid-range and budget segments by offering better specifications at lower prices.
The Redmi A5, priced at 7.5 million tomans, is a new phone with a commendable design despite its HD screen (720x1644K resolution) and low-end chipset, making it an acceptable choice for its price.
The Redmi 14C, costing around 10 million tomans, features a MediaTek Helio G81 processor, 4GB RAM, a 120Hz IPS LCD, a 50MP main camera, a 5160mAh battery, and runs Android 14, although its design might not universally appeal.
Opting for older models in the lower price ranges is generally not advised, as their market prices do not decrease enough to justify their diminished value.
This price segment presents several compelling smartphone options for consumers.
The Redmi Note 14s, available for 16-17 million tomans, is not recommended despite its popularity due to its very weak Helio G99 processor.
The Galaxy A26, approximately 17.5 million tomans, is a superior choice offering a 120Hz screen, good camera, reliable battery, Android 15, and an impressive promise of up to 6 years of software updates.
The Redmi Note 14 Pro, priced at 20 million tomans, is not recommended due to its inadequate MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra chipset.
The Poco I7, costing 22 million tomans, provides a much better Dimensity 7300 (4nm) chip, 8GB/12GB RAM, a 6.67-inch 120Hz AMOLED screen, an enhanced camera, and a 5100mAh battery, running Android 14/Hyper OS.
This category offers strong choices for users prioritizing performance and features.
The Galaxy A55, around 30 million tomans, offers better price-performance than the Galaxy A36 (26M) and A56 (33M), particularly in terms of its chipset.
The Poco X7 Pro, available for 30 million tomans, is highly valued for its powerful DRAM 8400 chip, 8GB RAM, good screen, and large 6000mAh battery, making it excellent for gaming and multitasking despite its camera performance being less competitive than Samsung models.
Limited but distinct recommendations are available in this higher price bracket.
The Xiaomi 14T and 14T Pro are not recommended due to being overpriced and ordinary, a stark contrast to the historical value of older Xiaomi T series phones.
The iPhone 16, priced at 65 million tomans, is significantly superior to the iPhone 14 (61 million) due to its newer specifications and improved features.
This segment showcases top-tier devices from leading manufacturers.
The iPhone 16, currently around 88 million tomans, is an excellent choice for individuals seeking a new and updated flagship smartphone.
The S25 Ultra, Samsung's latest flagship priced at 100 million tomans, stands out as an all-rounder that excels in its category and provides a comprehensive feature set.
This highest price tier features very few, exceedingly expensive options.
The Samsung S25 Edge, priced around 114 million tomans, is considered not worth its high cost.
Models like the iPhone 16 Pro Max, estimated at 140-145 million, exist but generally do not necessitate specific buying advice given their top-of-the-line status.
Honor and OnePlus phones are typically omitted from recommendations due to their high prices relative to specifications, poor price-performance, and significant challenges regarding parts availability and repair costs in the local market, with Honor phones often excelling in one area but lacking in others.
Beyond merely recommending phones, this guide critically identifies models currently not worth purchasing, providing clear reasons to aid informed decisions.
| category | model | priceRangeMillionTomans | keyStrengths | keyWeaknessesNotes | recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry-Level | Redmi A5 | 7.5 | New model, good design for its price, acceptable for basic use. | HD screen (720x1644K), low-end chipset, not Full HD. | Recommended |
| Entry-Level | Redmi 14C | ~10 | MediaTek Helio G81, 4GB RAM, 120Hz IPS LCD, 50MP camera, 5160mAh battery, Android 14. | Design might not be universally appealing. | Recommended |
| Mid-Range | Redmi Note 14s | 16-17 | New, popular in market. | Very weak Helio G99 processor, not worth the price. | Not Recommended |
| Mid-Range | Samsung Galaxy A26 | ~17.5 | 120Hz screen, good camera, good battery, Android 15, up to 6 years of software updates. | Slightly higher price than some competitors in its range. | Recommended |
| Mid-Range | Redmi Note 14 Pro | 20 | - | Weak MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra chipset, not worth the price. | Not Recommended |
| Mid-Range | Poco I7 | 22 | Much better Dimensity 7300 (4nm) chip, 8/12GB RAM, 6.67-inch 120Hz AMOLED screen, better camera, 5100mAh battery, Android 14/Hyper OS. | - | Recommended |
| Premium Mid-Range | Samsung Galaxy A55 | ~30 | Better price-performance than A36/A56, strong chipset. | - | Recommended |
| Premium Mid-Range | Poco X7 Pro | 30 | Powerful DRAM 8400 chip (excellent for gaming/multitasking), 8GB RAM, 6000mAh battery. | Camera performance is not as strong as competitors like Samsung. | Recommended |
| High-End (Overpriced) | Xiaomi 14T and 14T Pro | 40-65.5 | - | Overpriced, considered ordinary phones unlike older valuable T series. | Not Recommended |
| High-End | Apple iPhone 16 | 65 | Newer, significantly better specifications than iPhone 14. | Considered slightly expensive for its value at this price point. | Recommended |
| Flagship | Apple iPhone 16 | ~88 | New, updated flagship phone, reliable performance. | - | Recommended |
| Flagship | Samsung S25 Ultra | 100 | Latest Samsung flagship, all-rounder, complete feature set, beats many in its category. | - | Recommended |
| Ultra-Premium | Samsung S25 Edge | ~114 | - | Not worth its high price, considered an unwise purchase. | Not Recommended |
| General Exclusion | Honor & OnePlus (various models) | Varied | OnePlus has attractive new models. | High prices relative to specs, poor price-performance, significant issues with parts availability and repair costs; Honor often excels in one area but lags in others. | Not Recommended |
